Discussion:
Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts?
(too old to reply)
Ed Newsome
2016-03-17 09:32:47 UTC
Permalink
Cruz-Aligned Pastor: Execute Girl Scout Leaders
For 'Promoting Homosexuality'
3/14/2016
Kevin Swanson, the pastor courted by Ted Cruz who has
repeatedly called for the execution of gay people,
including just minutes before speaking with Cruz at
an event last November in Iowa, dedicated a radio
program last week to attacking the Girl Scouts for
supporting women’s and LGBT rights, saying that the
group’s leaders are worthy of death.
Not "christian" ... more like ISIL.
The girl and boy scout leadership are both corrupt nests of
cowards and left wing loons.

They can't be sent on their ways to Hell fast enough.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-17 13:00:48 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:32:47 +0100 (CET), "Ed Newsome"
Post by Ed Newsome
Cruz-Aligned Pastor: Execute Girl Scout Leaders
For 'Promoting Homosexuality'
3/14/2016
Kevin Swanson, the pastor courted by Ted Cruz who has
repeatedly called for the execution of gay people,
including just minutes before speaking with Cruz at
an event last November in Iowa, dedicated a radio
program last week to attacking the Girl Scouts for
supporting women’s and LGBT rights, saying that the
group’s leaders are worthy of death.
Not "christian" ... more like ISIL.
The girl and boy scout leadership are both corrupt nests of
cowards and left wing loons.
They can't be sent on their ways to Hell fast enough.
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.

Hugh
Mr. B1ack
2016-03-17 21:59:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:32:47 +0100 (CET), "Ed Newsome"
Post by Ed Newsome
Cruz-Aligned Pastor: Execute Girl Scout Leaders
For 'Promoting Homosexuality'
3/14/2016
Kevin Swanson, the pastor courted by Ted Cruz who has
repeatedly called for the execution of gay people,
including just minutes before speaking with Cruz at
an event last November in Iowa, dedicated a radio
program last week to attacking the Girl Scouts for
supporting women’s and LGBT rights, saying that the
group’s leaders are worthy of death.
Not "christian" ... more like ISIL.
The girl and boy scout leadership are both corrupt nests of
cowards and left wing loons.
They can't be sent on their ways to Hell fast enough.
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.

The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however. In the bad old days women were
not supposed to be "empowered" in ANY meaningful
way at all ... it was considered "bad for the family unit"
or even immoral. Therefore the GSAs mission to
smarten-up and power-up girls was a little bit radical
even before any militant feminists and lesbians got
involved.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-17 23:06:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.

BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.

Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.

Hugh
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-17 23:29:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
Mr. B1ack
2016-03-18 01:59:58 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:29:18 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
Careful now .... "bigotry" is a very subjective term and
can be applied to someone who, say, pisses on a
'christian organization' just because it doesn't always
believe in exactly what they believe ............

Interesting how only those OTHER people are bigots,
isn't it ? :-)
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 09:54:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.

What I do know is that no human can repeat it.

Hugh
Deanna Earley
2016-03-18 11:28:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.
Why would anything deliberately create the shithole that is this planet
and civilisation?
--
Deanna Earley (***@earlsoft.co.uk, ***@doesnotcompute.co.uk)

(Replies direct to my email address will be printed, shredded then fed
to the rats. Please reply to the group.)
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 14:35:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deanna Earley
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.
Why would anything deliberately create the shithole that is this planet
and civilisation?
I am so pleased that I don't live where you do.

Hugh
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:13:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident.
What are you basing that statement on?
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 14:40:09 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:13:04 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident.
What are you basing that statement on?
I'll change my mind if you can create anything even remotely
resembling the solar system and the consistency that exists. You can't
even drop a deck of cards from shoulder height and have them fall the
exact same way every time. Grass doesn't green every spring by
accident - you couldn't produce an offspring by mating with a horse -
and you can't create a planet without using God's dirt.

Hugh
Alex W.
2016-03-18 23:32:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:13:04 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident.
What are you basing that statement on?
I'll change my mind if you can create anything even remotely
resembling the solar system and the consistency that exists. You can't
even drop a deck of cards from shoulder height and have them fall the
exact same way every time. Grass doesn't green every spring by
accident - you couldn't produce an offspring by mating with a horse -
and you can't create a planet without using God's dirt.
Yet.

Fifty years ago, there was no IVF. Now we can make babies for infertile
couples just as god did in the OT.

We have unravelled the human DNA and we are beginning to master the art
of blending DNA to eliminate hereditary diseases or create babies with
specific DNA profiles.

We have learned the skill of melding the DNA of different animal species
and even blending animal with plant to produce new species.

We have learned how to send men to space. We are learning how to grow
organs from scratch.

And this is only in the past 20 years or so -- less than one human
generation. So just you wait. You will eat your words.
Mr. B1ack
2016-03-19 01:41:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:13:04 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident.
What are you basing that statement on?
I'll change my mind if you can create anything even remotely
resembling the solar system and the consistency that exists. You can't
even drop a deck of cards from shoulder height and have them fall the
exact same way every time. Grass doesn't green every spring by
accident - you couldn't produce an offspring by mating with a horse -
and you can't create a planet without using God's dirt.
Yet.
Fifty years ago, there was no IVF. Now we can make babies for infertile
couples just as god did in the OT.
We have unravelled the human DNA and we are beginning to master the art
of blending DNA to eliminate hereditary diseases or create babies with
specific DNA profiles.
We have learned the skill of melding the DNA of different animal species
and even blending animal with plant to produce new species.
We have learned how to send men to space. We are learning how to grow
organs from scratch.
And this is only in the past 20 years or so -- less than one human
generation. So just you wait. You will eat your words.
Alas he's supporting a "god of the gaps" ... but those
gaps keep getting narrower.

Dial back a couple thousand years and we didn't know
why the sky was blue or why it rained or why screwing
made babies or where the plague came from or even
where the two rocks got their start - 'god' had to be
*everywhere*, micromanaging *everything*.

But we learned.

And the pace of learning increases unabated ... maybe
the last barrier being our own IQs. But we'll learn to fix
that too ........

There will always be some 'gaps' and there will always be
people eager to squeeze supernatural entities into them.
Do not hate these people however, they just long for a
simpler universe where things are taken care of for them
and they need only follow a few little rules to stay tight
with the super-spook(s).

Hmm ... a lot like Bernies voters actually .... craving a
nanny state with lots of 'free' stuff managed by some
benevolent entity who'll make sure everything turns
out just fine ...... :-)
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 10:47:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
There will always be some 'gaps' and there will always be
people eager to squeeze supernatural entities into them.
Do not hate these people however, they just long for a
simpler universe where things are taken care of for them
and they need only follow a few little rules to stay tight
with the super-spook(s).
You seem to forget that many of us prefer competition to being taken
care of. But we do try to follow a code of reasonable standards that
non-believers are incompetent to understand - as you just proved
above. Thank you for playing.

Hugh
Mr. B1ack
2016-03-19 20:06:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
There will always be some 'gaps' and there will always be
people eager to squeeze supernatural entities into them.
Do not hate these people however, they just long for a
simpler universe where things are taken care of for them
and they need only follow a few little rules to stay tight
with the super-spook(s).
You seem to forget that many of us prefer competition to being taken
care of. But we do try to follow a code of reasonable standards that
non-believers are incompetent to understand - as you just proved
above. Thank you for playing.
And after I said nice things about you and the BSA ....

But sorry, supernatualists are the ones showing the
incompetence/ignorance. A world run according to
that old claptrap is a world run *wrong*.

Look-up the terms "ethics" and "empathy". They explain
how and why to be good to yer fellows (even those GSA
demon-lesbians) and no super-spooks are required.

J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 10:42:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:13:04 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident.
What are you basing that statement on?
I'll change my mind if you can create anything even remotely
resembling the solar system and the consistency that exists. You can't
even drop a deck of cards from shoulder height and have them fall the
exact same way every time. Grass doesn't green every spring by
accident - you couldn't produce an offspring by mating with a horse -
and you can't create a planet without using God's dirt.
Yet.
Fifty years ago, there was no IVF. Now we can make babies for infertile
couples just as god did in the OT.
We have unravelled the human DNA and we are beginning to master the art
of blending DNA to eliminate hereditary diseases or create babies with
specific DNA profiles.
We have learned the skill of melding the DNA of different animal species
and even blending animal with plant to produce new species.
We have learned how to send men to space. We are learning how to grow
organs from scratch.
And this is only in the past 20 years or so -- less than one human
generation. So just you wait. You will eat your words.
Evolution is the rapid advance of God-given talents. Thank you for
your attendance.

Hugh
Alex W.
2016-03-18 23:18:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
I think he's trying to reference a self-assembling universe,
say he think's it can't happen without super-spooks being
in charge of things. Of course who was in charge of making
the super-spooks ... ? :-)
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.
Why was it on purpose?

Is it not the height of arrogance to impute intent?

What hubris to believe that we are so great, so unique, so special that
there simply MUST be a purpose behind our existence...
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
What I do know is that no human can repeat it.
Yet.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 10:50:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.
Why was it on purpose?
Is it not the height of arrogance to impute intent?
So what?
Post by Alex W.
What hubris to believe that we are so great, so unique, so special that
there simply MUST be a purpose behind our existence...
If you aren't, you shouldn't.
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
What I do know is that no human can repeat it.
Yet.
About the 12th story of a 24 story fall the man said, "So far, so
good!"

Hugh
Alex W.
2016-03-19 12:12:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.
Why was it on purpose?
Is it not the height of arrogance to impute intent?
So what?
That comment alone says so many things about you ... and nothing flattering.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Alex W.
What hubris to believe that we are so great, so unique, so special that
there simply MUST be a purpose behind our existence...
If you aren't, you shouldn't.
Oh, I know I am absolutely unique ... just like everyone else.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 13:28:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.
Why was it on purpose?
Is it not the height of arrogance to impute intent?
So what?
That comment alone says so many things about you ... and nothing flattering.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Fortunately your's does not matter
so far.

Hugh
Pete
2016-03-19 17:29:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I'm saying creation was not an accident. It was an on purpose. I can't
explain where the Creator came from any more than you can explain
where the two rocks came from.
Why was it on purpose?
Is it not the height of arrogance to impute intent?
So what?
That comment alone says so many things about you ... and nothing flattering.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Alex W.
What hubris to believe that we are so great, so unique, so special that
there simply MUST be a purpose behind our existence...
If you aren't, you shouldn't.
Oh, I know I am absolutely unique ... just like everyone else.
Mental illness isn't unique. It's quite common in the left wing
of life.
Alex W.
2016-03-18 10:07:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:29:18 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
Careful now .... "bigotry" is a very subjective term and
can be applied to someone who, say, pisses on a
'christian organization' just because it doesn't always
believe in exactly what they believe ............
Interesting how only those OTHER people are bigots,
isn't it ? :-)
Oddly, I have never actually met a bigot who fits the original
definition: one who can recite the "begat" lists of genealogy in the
bible from heart.

<sigh>

Bigots really aren't what they used to be. The youth of today....
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 08:54:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates.
I earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter
to National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had
little choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do
that duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have
passed our Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone
disagreed with me. Membership in a Church is not a requirement.
But anyone who thinks two rocks colliding produced the consistency
we see every day needs to have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
You expect that little turd to answer you?
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 09:59:28 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:54:35 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
You expect that little turd to answer you?
Did your mother really win Best of Breed at the kennel show?

Hugh
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:12:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:54:35 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
You expect that little turd to answer you?
Did your mother really win Best of Breed at the kennel show?
See--he's trying really hard to be nasty here, but all he has is an
ancient joke of 8-year olds.
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 14:42:00 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:12:27 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:54:35 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
You expect that little turd to answer you?
Did your mother really win Best of Breed at the kennel show?
See--he's trying really hard to be nasty here, but all he has is an
ancient joke of 8-year olds.
Why do I get blamed for posting simply enough for you to understand.
Would you like to try one for 9 year olds?

Hugh
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:11:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates.
I earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter
to National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had
little choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do
that duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have
passed our Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone
disagreed with me. Membership in a Church is not a requirement.
But anyone who thinks two rocks colliding produced the consistency
we see every day needs to have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
You expect that little turd to answer you?
I like to see how nasty they try to be to avoid answering the question.
It amuses me.
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 14:43:54 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:11:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
I like to see how nasty they try to be to avoid answering the question.
It amuses me.
I have to work harder to amuse some people but it's easier with you
low IQ people.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 11:53:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils
were NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have
been registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review
for Eagle Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than
400 candidates. I earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a
letter to National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated
they had little choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have
asked you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout
promises to do that duty to the best of his ability. A queer
would never have passed our Board. I resigned because of age
not because anyone disagreed with me. Membership in a Church
is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two rocks
colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
You expect that little turd to answer you?
I like to see how nasty they try to be to avoid answering the
question. It amuses me.
I know. You're cool.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 13:30:39 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:53:17 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jeanne Douglas
I like to see how nasty they try to be to avoid answering the
question. It amuses me.
I know. You're cool.
I suspect 5' 2", 250# and frigid is more accurate.

Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 09:50:58 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:29:18 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
I doubt you have the comprehensive ability to understand the
explanation. Your mtDNA is a bit Neanderthalish.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
Everyone is bigoted about something. In your ignorance you act as if
it bigotry is limited to those who disagree with you. And what made
you ASSume I said it was moral?

Hugh
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:15:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:29:18 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
I doubt you have the comprehensive ability to understand the
explanation. Your mtDNA is a bit Neanderthalish.
See, there's that incompetent attempt at nastiness because he can't
answer the question.

Try again. It really doesn't hurt to actually answer the simple
questions you are asked. Your writing is just not as clear as it should
be so you should be happy to clarify.
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
Everyone is bigoted about something. In your ignorance you act as if
it bigotry is limited to those who disagree with you.
When did I say anything in the same universe as that straw man? My exact
words, in their full context, please.
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 14:48:56 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:15:21 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:29:18 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
What "consistency"? And what two rocks are you talking about?
I doubt you have the comprehensive ability to understand the
explanation. Your mtDNA is a bit Neanderthalish.
See, there's that incompetent attempt at nastiness because he can't
answer the question.
If it was incompetent how did you know it was nasty. You prove my
point in spite of yourself.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Try again. It really doesn't hurt to actually answer the simple
questions you are asked. Your writing is just not as clear as it should
be so you should be happy to clarify.
Read it again when you reach puberty.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Why do you think bigotry is moral?
Everyone is bigoted about something. In your ignorance you act as if
it bigotry is limited to those who disagree with you.
When did I say anything in the same universe as that straw man? My exact
words, in their full context, please.
If you can't remember what you said in the last 24 hours I'll not look
it up. You are the two-bit clerk here, not me. And, at min wage you
are overpaid.

Hugh
First Post
2016-03-18 00:02:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Hugh
I remember in the 1960s in elementary school, by the time I was in 3rd
grade virtually every 8 year old male in the school had joined the Cub
Scouts. By the time I started Junior High roughly a quarter of them
were still scouts advancing up to the Boy Scouts.
I was a Cub Scout and then later on, in my Junior year in high school,
I joined the Explorers. In Memphis it was a Police post. And I was
in it until I graduated.

Today I work in a lot of both public and private schools servicing
mass notification systems and emergency communication systems.
I don't remember the last time I saw even a single Cub Scout in any of
them in at least 3 decades now. Of course, for the last five or six
years the school uniform policies prevent the kids from wearing their
uniforms to school as we used to on the days of the meetings, But I
doubt you'd see any regardless these days.

Back then when Scouting was seen as something that every boy should at
least try, we never had any of the kind of violence and crime that you
now see rampant in the very same schools today.
Boys carried pocket knives even in elementary school and no one ever
even came close to a knife fight. Even by the time I graduated High
school in 1975, kids still just had the typical schoolyard fist fight
and no weapons were used. And you rarely ever saw or heard any young
folks talking to older folks the way a lot of them do today. Even
though we may have been rowdy teenagers, we still said ma'am and sir
to our elder generations. Call it a "Leave It To Beaver" mentality,
and much of it came from the Scouts re-enforcing a lot of what our
parents were teaching us at home.

No one can deny that Scouting had a positive influence on the kids.
But now, thanks to the so called bleeding hearts who made it their
mission to destroy the Scouts for what they stood for, our schools
feel more like prisons with full time police officers being necessary
in order to keep the students at least somewhat peaceful.
You see kids talking to their own mothers as if they were gutter trash
and even physically abusing them in some instances.

"On my honor, I will do my best
To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law;
To help other people at all times;
To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake and morally
straight."

Try to find a boy today that just remembers hearing or reading that
oath, much less knows where it came from, and you will be looking long
and hard.

And the state of the youth today is a reflection of what happens when
the left succeeds in removing all positive groups and organizations
from our culture such as the BSA, GSA and even the Eddie Eagle program
of the NRA. Even school sanctioned programs such as ROTC are
ridiculed and discouraged.
As a nation we have allowed the few to assault and pervert virtually
anything and everything that even remotely promotes any moral
behavior.
It is no surprise that the result is a geometric increase in amoral
behavior.
Mr. B1ack
2016-03-18 02:07:02 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:02:42 -0500, First Post
Post by First Post
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Hugh
I remember in the 1960s in elementary school, by the time I was in 3rd
grade virtually every 8 year old male in the school had joined the Cub
Scouts. By the time I started Junior High roughly a quarter of them
were still scouts advancing up to the Boy Scouts.
I was a Cub Scout and then later on, in my Junior year in high school,
I joined the Explorers. In Memphis it was a Police post. And I was
in it until I graduated.
Today I work in a lot of both public and private schools servicing
mass notification systems and emergency communication systems.
I don't remember the last time I saw even a single Cub Scout in any of
them in at least 3 decades now. Of course, for the last five or six
years the school uniform policies prevent the kids from wearing their
uniforms to school as we used to on the days of the meetings, But I
doubt you'd see any regardless these days.
Back then when Scouting was seen as something that every boy should at
least try, we never had any of the kind of violence and crime that you
now see rampant in the very same schools today.
Boys carried pocket knives even in elementary school and no one ever
even came close to a knife fight. Even by the time I graduated High
school in 1975, kids still just had the typical schoolyard fist fight
and no weapons were used. And you rarely ever saw or heard any young
folks talking to older folks the way a lot of them do today. Even
though we may have been rowdy teenagers, we still said ma'am and sir
to our elder generations. Call it a "Leave It To Beaver" mentality,
and much of it came from the Scouts re-enforcing a lot of what our
parents were teaching us at home.
No one can deny that Scouting had a positive influence on the kids.
But now, thanks to the so called bleeding hearts who made it their
mission to destroy the Scouts for what they stood for, our schools
feel more like prisons with full time police officers being necessary
in order to keep the students at least somewhat peaceful.
You see kids talking to their own mothers as if they were gutter trash
and even physically abusing them in some instances.
"On my honor, I will do my best
To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law;
To help other people at all times;
To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake and morally
straight."
Try to find a boy today that just remembers hearing or reading that
oath, much less knows where it came from, and you will be looking long
and hard.
And the state of the youth today is a reflection of what happens when
the left succeeds in removing all positive groups and organizations
from our culture such as the BSA, GSA and even the Eddie Eagle program
of the NRA. Even school sanctioned programs such as ROTC are
ridiculed and discouraged.
As a nation we have allowed the few to assault and pervert virtually
anything and everything that even remotely promotes any moral
behavior.
It is no surprise that the result is a geometric increase in amoral
behavior.
The only way for the further-left to control tomorrows society
is for it to totally gut yesterdays society. So, in the guise of
"enlightenment", it has attacked every aspect of the old
'conservative' America, it's ideas and ideals, its vision
and even its religion. Tear it all down to a smouldering
ruin.

Of course they're idiots ... what they've created is not
anything they can take control of - it's more a "Mad
Max" sort of world instead.
Jon Brooks
2016-03-18 05:55:52 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@4ax.com>
First Post <Liberals-Have-No-Point-If-They-Can't-Lie-About-
Post by First Post
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Hugh
I remember in the 1960s in elementary school, by the time I was in 3rd
grade virtually every 8 year old male in the school had joined the Cub
Scouts. By the time I started Junior High roughly a quarter of them
were still scouts advancing up to the Boy Scouts.
I was a Cub Scout and then later on, in my Junior year in high school,
I joined the Explorers. In Memphis it was a Police post. And I was
in it until I graduated.
Today I work in a lot of both public and private schools servicing
mass notification systems and emergency communication systems.
I don't remember the last time I saw even a single Cub Scout in any of
them in at least 3 decades now. Of course, for the last five or six
years the school uniform policies prevent the kids from wearing their
uniforms to school as we used to on the days of the meetings, But I
doubt you'd see any regardless these days.
Back then when Scouting was seen as something that every boy should at
least try, we never had any of the kind of violence and crime that you
now see rampant in the very same schools today.
In the old days, the last thing you wanted to tangle with in
school, was a bunch of boy scouts in uniform because they were a
confident lot who would beat some ass to a pulp and take their
lumps for it. They stuck up for each other and usually had
positive role model big brothers too. We can thank the sneering
left wing for the currently sad state of a once proud
organization.
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 08:32:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jon Brooks
First Post <Liberals-Have-No-Point-If-They-Can't-Lie-About-
Post by First Post
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Hugh
I remember in the 1960s in elementary school, by the time I was in 3rd
grade virtually every 8 year old male in the school had joined the Cub
Scouts. By the time I started Junior High roughly a quarter of them
were still scouts advancing up to the Boy Scouts.
I was a Cub Scout and then later on, in my Junior year in high school,
I joined the Explorers. In Memphis it was a Police post. And I was
in it until I graduated.
Today I work in a lot of both public and private schools servicing
mass notification systems and emergency communication systems.
I don't remember the last time I saw even a single Cub Scout in any of
them in at least 3 decades now. Of course, for the last five or six
years the school uniform policies prevent the kids from wearing their
uniforms to school as we used to on the days of the meetings, But I
doubt you'd see any regardless these days.
Back then when Scouting was seen as something that every boy should at
least try, we never had any of the kind of violence and crime that you
now see rampant in the very same schools today.
In the old days, the last thing you wanted to tangle with in
school, was a bunch of boy scouts in uniform because they were a
confident lot who would beat some ass to a pulp and take their
lumps for it. They stuck up for each other and usually had
positive role model big brothers too. We can thank the sneering
left wing for the currently sad state of a once proud
organization.
You mean that formerly bigoted organization?
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 10:15:53 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:32:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
You mean that formerly bigoted organization?
That means you are no longer bigoted about BSA. C'mom, babe, you are
as bigoted as anyone - just like me.

Hugh
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:11:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:32:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
You mean that formerly bigoted organization?
That means you are no longer bigoted about BSA. C'mom, babe, you are
as bigoted as anyone - just like me.
Care to translate that word salad into English??
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 14:50:06 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:11:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:32:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
You mean that formerly bigoted organization?
That means you are no longer bigoted about BSA. C'mom, babe, you are
as bigoted as anyone - just like me.
Care to translate that word salad into English??
You could always get a job as a ventriloquist's dummy.

Hugh
Bob Officer
2016-03-18 18:27:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:32:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
You mean that formerly bigoted organization?
That means you are no longer bigoted about BSA. C'mom, babe, you are
as bigoted as anyone - just like me.
Bigotry is unfounded bias.

I still hold reasonable biases about the BSA.
My bias is founded in some real concerns about the organization.
Sir LarfaLot
2016-03-19 04:31:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Officer
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:32:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
You mean that formerly bigoted organization?
That means you are no longer bigoted about BSA. C'mom, babe, you are
as bigoted as anyone - just like me.
Bigotry is unfounded bias.
I still hold reasonable biases about the BSA.
My bias is founded in some real concerns about the organization.
Well, well. If it isn't a faux Bob Officer sock. Tell us, Bob,
is your asshole still sore from the reamings you got during the
Edmo days? If it is, maybe you can be a modern day scout
master. Could be prostate cancer too.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 11:09:34 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:27:27 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:32:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
You mean that formerly bigoted organization?
That means you are no longer bigoted about BSA. C'mom, babe, you are
as bigoted as anyone - just like me.
Bigotry is unfounded bias.
Merriam-Webster noun big·ot \'bi-g?t\

Simple Definition of bigot
: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)

Exactly as I said, if you strongly differ with me you are bigoted. I
laugh at the simpletons who think that only goes one way. Obviously
Jeanne Whatshermane is incapable off using a dictionary. Otherwise she
wouldn't use bigot as ignorantly as she does.
Post by Bob Officer
I still hold reasonable biases about the BSA.
Reasonable is in the eye of the beholder - as in the definition above.
Post by Bob Officer
My bias is founded in some real concerns about the organization.
I have no problem with how you feel about the BSA. I have some
problems with BSA also. But I informed THEM in writing.

I have served on the committee to select college NROTC candidates, I
was liaison for Naval Academy appointees for 10 years in this area so
I know how many of them had Eagle Scout on their resume. I know the
military offers one rank advancement to people who are Eagle Scouts.
Our oldest son and I were both company commanders of our recruit
companies in basic training and we are both Eagle Scouts - me for 72+
years.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 09:05:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jon Brooks
First Post <Liberals-Have-No-Point-If-They-Can't-Lie-About-
Post by First Post
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils
were NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400
candidates. I earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a
letter to National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated
they had little choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have
asked you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises
to do that duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never
have passed our Board. I resigned because of age not because
anyone disagreed with me. Membership in a Church is not a
requirement. But anyone who thinks two rocks colliding produced
the consistency we see every day needs to have his crayons taken
away by the guards.
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Hugh
I remember in the 1960s in elementary school, by the time I was in
3rd grade virtually every 8 year old male in the school had joined
the Cub Scouts. By the time I started Junior High roughly a
quarter of them were still scouts advancing up to the Boy Scouts.
I was a Cub Scout and then later on, in my Junior year in high
school, I joined the Explorers. In Memphis it was a Police post.
And I was in it until I graduated.
Today I work in a lot of both public and private schools servicing
mass notification systems and emergency communication systems.
I don't remember the last time I saw even a single Cub Scout in any
of them in at least 3 decades now. Of course, for the last five or
six years the school uniform policies prevent the kids from wearing
their uniforms to school as we used to on the days of the meetings,
But I doubt you'd see any regardless these days.
Back then when Scouting was seen as something that every boy should
at least try, we never had any of the kind of violence and crime
that you now see rampant in the very same schools today.
In the old days, the last thing you wanted to tangle with in
school, was a bunch of boy scouts in uniform because they were a
confident lot who would beat some ass to a pulp and take their
lumps for it. They stuck up for each other and usually had
positive role model big brothers too. We can thank the sneering
left wing for the currently sad state of a once proud
organization.
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of them
were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 10:29:29 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of them
were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.

I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would have
the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them enjoyed a
good fight. And I went to Alabama on a football scholarship in 1946
when I was released from AcDu in the Navy.

We ran through belt lines for fun in the 40s and we played hide and
seek at meetings - the difference was that you had to bring the person
in to score. Some put up pretty good resistance. You sound pretty
pattycake.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 12:29:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of
them were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would have
the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and young
man than both of them together, and I still have the scars and busted
up parts to prove it. Boy Scouts? When I saw them in uniform, I
regularly called them "boy shit" to their faces and not one of them
ever jumped on me for it. (And yes, I'm VERY embarrassed by the way I
used to be then.)

Now? No, I might still have the "courage" (although even that's
doubtful) but not the inclination. In fact, I now always deliberately
act like a wimp and yield for everybody with my head bowed, no matter
how small they are (and I'm a big guy.) I think that's partly to make
up for the way I was when I was young. Also, I regularly carry a gun
and don't want to ever be forced to use it.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
good fight. And I went to Alabama on a football scholarship in 1946
when I was released from AcDu in the Navy.
There are no "good fights", at least not of the sort you mean. Only
abysmally stupid assholes fight.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
We ran through belt lines for fun in the 40s and we played hide and
seek at meetings - the difference was that you had to bring the person
in to score. Some put up pretty good resistance. You sound pretty
pattycake.
Baker man?
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 15:03:06 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:29:14 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of
them were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
By 1946 lots of them in about 30 states and a few foreign countries.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would have
the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and young
man than both of them together, and I still have the scars and busted
up parts to prove it.
If you were much of a fighter you would not have the physical
problems. Our older son was in more than 100 fights and he has no
scars.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Boy Scouts? When I saw them in uniform, I
regularly called them "boy shit" to their faces and not one of them
ever jumped on me for it. (And yes, I'm VERY embarrassed by the way I
used to be then.)
Apparently you grew up in the right place to get away with that.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Now? No, I might still have the "courage" (although even that's
doubtful) but not the inclination. In fact, I now always deliberately
act like a wimp and yield for everybody with my head bowed, no matter
how small they are (and I'm a big guy.) I think that's partly to make
up for the way I was when I was young. Also, I regularly carry a gun
and don't want to ever be forced to use it.
I suppose some people have to carry a gun to be safe.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
good fight. And I went to Alabama on a football scholarship in 1946
when I was released from AcDu in the Navy.
There are no "good fights", at least not of the sort you mean. Only
abysmally stupid assholes fight.
You said you fought so the conclusion is obvious.

Hugh
Alex W.
2016-03-18 23:37:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:29:14 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of
them were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
By 1946 lots of them in about 30 states and a few foreign countries.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would have
the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and young
man than both of them together, and I still have the scars and busted
up parts to prove it.
If you were much of a fighter you would not have the physical
problems. Our older son was in more than 100 fights and he has no
scars.
That is not something to be proud of, you know.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 11:14:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:29:14 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of
them were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
By 1946 lots of them in about 30 states and a few foreign countries.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would have
the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and young
man than both of them together, and I still have the scars and busted
up parts to prove it.
If you were much of a fighter you would not have the physical
problems. Our older son was in more than 100 fights and he has no
scars.
That is not something to be proud of, you know.
I'm not proud of the one he lost. But he learned that most 14 year
olds can't whip 16 year olds who also love to fight.

I believe in the superiority of people who teach others not to abuse
them and who rise through the ranks of employment and the military
because they proved themselves. The others eat a lot of dust.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 11:43:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:29:14 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and
the Boy Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies.
Literally none of them were athletes, either. (At least, none
that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
By 1946 lots of them in about 30 states and a few foreign countries.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you
would have the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two
of them enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and
young man than both of them together, and I still have the scars
and busted up parts to prove it.
If you were much of a fighter you would not have the physical
problems. Our older son was in more than 100 fights and he has no
scars.
That is not something to be proud of, you know.
Read between the lines, Alex. I kill-filtered that little idiot shortly
after I read his response. He's obviously lived his whole long life
with his head planted firmly up his ass but never even realized it.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 13:33:38 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:43:55 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Read between the lines, Alex. I kill-filtered that little idiot shortly
after I read his response. He's obviously lived his whole long life
with his head planted firmly up his ass but never even realized it.
Ah! The typical response of a coward. Run when they are too inept to
compete. And I had enough people doormats already.

Hugh
Alex W.
2016-03-18 23:36:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of
them were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would have
the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and young
man than both of them together, and I still have the scars and busted
up parts to prove it. Boy Scouts? When I saw them in uniform, I
regularly called them "boy shit" to their faces and not one of them
ever jumped on me for it. (And yes, I'm VERY embarrassed by the way I
used to be then.)
Now? No, I might still have the "courage" (although even that's
doubtful) but not the inclination. In fact, I now always deliberately
act like a wimp and yield for everybody with my head bowed, no matter
how small they are (and I'm a big guy.) I think that's partly to make
up for the way I was when I was young. Also, I regularly carry a gun
and don't want to ever be forced to use it.
Being a man is about lots of things.

Amongst others, it's not just about knowing how to fight but even more
how and when not to fight.

Going round indulging in fistfights at the drop of a hat only shows that
a person hasn't yet mastered himself.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 11:16:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Being a man is about lots of things.
That's about as unarguable as it gets.
Post by Alex W.
Amongst others, it's not just about knowing how to fight but even more
how and when not to fight.
Going round indulging in fistfights at the drop of a hat only shows that
a person hasn't yet mastered himself.
The point is to master others. Mastering oneself takes a lifetime.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 11:37:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and
the Boy Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies.
Literally none of them were athletes, either. (At least, none
that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would
have the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them
enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and
young man than both of them together, and I still have the scars
and busted up parts to prove it. Boy Scouts? When I saw them in
uniform, I regularly called them "boy shit" to their faces and not
one of them ever jumped on me for it. (And yes, I'm VERY
embarrassed by the way I used to be then.)
Now? No, I might still have the "courage" (although even that's
doubtful) but not the inclination. In fact, I now always
deliberately act like a wimp and yield for everybody with my head
bowed, no matter how small they are (and I'm a big guy.) I think
that's partly to make up for the way I was when I was young. Also,
I regularly carry a gun and don't want to ever be forced to use it.
Being a man is about lots of things.
Amongst others, it's not just about knowing how to fight but even
more how and when not to fight.
Going round indulging in fistfights at the drop of a hat only shows
that a person hasn't yet mastered himself.
It was worse than that in my case. I was mentally imbalanced. As a
teenager, I was also a criminal. Half of my friends from that era went
to prison and a significant fraction of them died young. One with whom
I still keep in contact has been paralyzed from a bullet shot all of
his adult life. That kinda shit. I was DAMN lucky that my life did a
180 after my teen years.
Alex W.
2016-03-19 12:16:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Alex W.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and
the Boy Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies.
Literally none of them were athletes, either. (At least, none
that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing the
obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you would
have the courage to call them sissies to their face. Two of them
enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and
young man than both of them together, and I still have the scars
and busted up parts to prove it. Boy Scouts? When I saw them in
uniform, I regularly called them "boy shit" to their faces and not
one of them ever jumped on me for it. (And yes, I'm VERY
embarrassed by the way I used to be then.)
Now? No, I might still have the "courage" (although even that's
doubtful) but not the inclination. In fact, I now always
deliberately act like a wimp and yield for everybody with my head
bowed, no matter how small they are (and I'm a big guy.) I think
that's partly to make up for the way I was when I was young. Also,
I regularly carry a gun and don't want to ever be forced to use it.
Being a man is about lots of things.
Amongst others, it's not just about knowing how to fight but even
more how and when not to fight.
Going round indulging in fistfights at the drop of a hat only shows
that a person hasn't yet mastered himself.
It was worse than that in my case. I was mentally imbalanced. As a
teenager, I was also a criminal. Half of my friends from that era went
to prison and a significant fraction of them died young. One with whom
I still keep in contact has been paralyzed from a bullet shot all of
his adult life. That kinda shit. I was DAMN lucky that my life did a
180 after my teen years.
... and that it wasn't a 180 in a stolen car while trying to outrun the
cops, presumably ...

Some people not only learn lessons from life but act on that knowledge.
A lot don't. Good on you that you caught that learning curve.
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 15:33:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Alex W.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and
the Boy Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies.
Literally none of them were athletes, either. (At least,
none that I can recall.)
Wasn't universal? You have an amazing talent for recognizing
the obvious. Exceptional is rarely universal.
You may be right, but with which how many communities were you familiar?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I have two Eagle sons and two Eagle Grandsons. I doubt you
would have the courage to call them sissies to their face.
Two of them enjoyed a
I'd no doubt gotten into over twice as many fights as a teen and
young man than both of them together, and I still have the scars
and busted up parts to prove it. Boy Scouts? When I saw them in
uniform, I regularly called them "boy shit" to their faces and
not one of them ever jumped on me for it. (And yes, I'm VERY
embarrassed by the way I used to be then.)
Now? No, I might still have the "courage" (although even that's
doubtful) but not the inclination. In fact, I now always
deliberately act like a wimp and yield for everybody with my
head bowed, no matter how small they are (and I'm a big guy.) I
think that's partly to make up for the way I was when I was
young. Also, I regularly carry a gun and don't want to ever be
forced to use it.
Being a man is about lots of things.
Amongst others, it's not just about knowing how to fight but even
more how and when not to fight.
Going round indulging in fistfights at the drop of a hat only
shows that a person hasn't yet mastered himself.
It was worse than that in my case. I was mentally imbalanced. As a
teenager, I was also a criminal. Half of my friends from that era
went to prison and a significant fraction of them died young. One
with whom I still keep in contact has been paralyzed from a bullet
shot all of his adult life. That kinda shit. I was DAMN lucky that
my life did a 180 after my teen years.
... and that it wasn't a 180 in a stolen car while trying to outrun
the cops, presumably ...
LOL! Right. :)
Post by Alex W.
Some people not only learn lessons from life but act on that
knowledge. A lot don't. Good on you that you caught that learning
curve.
Thanks Alex.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 13:39:09 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:37:05 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
It was worse than that in my case. I was mentally imbalanced. As a
teenager, I was also a criminal. Half of my friends from that era went
to prison and a significant fraction of them died young. One with whom
I still keep in contact has been paralyzed from a bullet shot all of
his adult life. That kinda shit. I was DAMN lucky that my life did a
180 after my teen years.
Whether or not we agree your turnaround is admirable. I can't walk in
your shoes because my environment was much different.

I think the friends we choose in life determine, in large part, if we
are to be successful.

Hugh
First Post
2016-03-18 20:39:00 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
First Post <Liberals-Have-No-Point-If-They-Can't-Lie-About-
Post by First Post
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils
were NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400
candidates. I earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a
letter to National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated
they had little choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have
asked you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises
to do that duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never
have passed our Board. I resigned because of age not because
anyone disagreed with me. Membership in a Church is not a
requirement. But anyone who thinks two rocks colliding produced
the consistency we see every day needs to have his crayons taken
away by the guards.
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Hugh
I remember in the 1960s in elementary school, by the time I was in
3rd grade virtually every 8 year old male in the school had joined
the Cub Scouts. By the time I started Junior High roughly a
quarter of them were still scouts advancing up to the Boy Scouts.
I was a Cub Scout and then later on, in my Junior year in high
school, I joined the Explorers. In Memphis it was a Police post.
And I was in it until I graduated.
Today I work in a lot of both public and private schools servicing
mass notification systems and emergency communication systems.
I don't remember the last time I saw even a single Cub Scout in any
of them in at least 3 decades now. Of course, for the last five or
six years the school uniform policies prevent the kids from wearing
their uniforms to school as we used to on the days of the meetings,
But I doubt you'd see any regardless these days.
Back then when Scouting was seen as something that every boy should
at least try, we never had any of the kind of violence and crime
that you now see rampant in the very same schools today.
In the old days, the last thing you wanted to tangle with in
school, was a bunch of boy scouts in uniform because they were a
confident lot who would beat some ass to a pulp and take their
lumps for it. They stuck up for each other and usually had
positive role model big brothers too. We can thank the sneering
left wing for the currently sad state of a once proud
organization.
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of them
were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Don't know where you went to school but at my old alma mater in
Memphis, Trezevant HS, literally every boy who played on our champion
football team were former Cub and Boy Scouts.
Although I never cared for athletic participation back then because it
took time away from my hanging out with friends and chasing skirts, I
was never ever considered to be any kind of "sissy".

I was in the ROTC drill team as well as our state champion rifle team
as I could, and still can, shoot the ass out of a gnat at 50 feet.
Yes, that is simply an expression but the targets we used were the
size of a half dollar and they indeed were pinned at the 50 foot line
and I consistently shot bullseyes.

But back to the scouts, some of the toughest and meanest kids I knew
also were in the scouts at least for a while.

And yes there were some that could be considered "sissies" in the
classic sense but they were still honest, hard working and all around
good kids.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 11:30:14 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:39:00 -0500, First Post
Post by First Post
Don't know where you went to school but at my old alma mater in
Memphis, Trezevant HS, literally every boy who played on our champion
football team were former Cub and Boy Scouts.
Greenville MS was the only place I was ever born. I was stationed at
Millington in 1946 after being flown home from Hawaii to take the
exams for the Naval Academy.
Post by First Post
Although I never cared for athletic participation back then because it
took time away from my hanging out with friends and chasing skirts, I
was never ever considered to be any kind of "sissy".
My participation was limited - I broke my ankle 4 times.
Post by First Post
I was in the ROTC drill team as well as our state champion rifle team
as I could, and still can, shoot the ass out of a gnat at 50 feet.
Can you strike a match upright on a tree stump at 10' with a .22?
Post by First Post
Yes, that is simply an expression but the targets we used were the
size of a half dollar and they indeed were pinned at the 50 foot line
and I consistently shot bullseyes.
I earned NRA Sharpshooter and qualified with the 30.06 at Great Lakes.
Post by First Post
But back to the scouts, some of the toughest and meanest kids I knew
also were in the scouts at least for a while.
I never met any mean ones.
Post by First Post
And yes there were some that could be considered "sissies" in the
classic sense but they were still honest, hard working and all around
good kids.
And that's why you can't make a kid sing for a lost article or take
him on a snipe hunt - the little sissies won.

When I was a Webelos Leader the kids learned to box - I'd be thrown
off the edge of the world for that now - but 8 of 10 earned Eagle -
one more should have and one moved out of town.

I insisted on kids and grandkids being involved in leadership training
but BSA was not mandatory.

Hugh
Dave Schulte
2016-03-19 18:33:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:39:00 -0500, First Post
Post by First Post
Don't know where you went to school but at my old alma mater in
Memphis, Trezevant HS, literally every boy who played on our champion
football team were former Cub and Boy Scouts.
Greenville MS was the only place I was ever born. I was stationed at
Millington in 1946 after being flown home from Hawaii to take the
exams for the Naval Academy.
Post by First Post
Although I never cared for athletic participation back then because it
took time away from my hanging out with friends and chasing skirts, I
was never ever considered to be any kind of "sissy".
My participation was limited - I broke my ankle 4 times.
Post by First Post
I was in the ROTC drill team as well as our state champion rifle team
as I could, and still can, shoot the ass out of a gnat at 50 feet.
Can you strike a match upright on a tree stump at 10' with a .22?
Post by First Post
Yes, that is simply an expression but the targets we used were the
size of a half dollar and they indeed were pinned at the 50 foot line
and I consistently shot bullseyes.
I earned NRA Sharpshooter and qualified with the 30.06 at Great Lakes.
Post by First Post
But back to the scouts, some of the toughest and meanest kids I knew
also were in the scouts at least for a while.
I never met any mean ones.
You never met me, grin!

But I had to be. I grew up across the river from St Louis. If
you were weak, you got beaten and your lunch money eaten by
black punks. Hunger is a powerful incentive to fight for what
is right. The survival fortitude I gained in scouting has
sustained me through a military career and a few life defining
career changes.
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 11:46:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:05:58 GMT, "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
First Post <Liberals-Have-No-Point-If-They-Can't-Lie-About-
Post by First Post
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:59:47 -0400, Mr. B1ack
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils
were NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have
been >> > > registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review
for Eagle >> > > Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than
400 >> > > candidates. I earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
Post by First Post
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and
the >> > > queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did
business >> > > with the population and there were repercussions. I
wrote a >> > > letter to National expressing my opinion. The reply
indicated >> > > they had little choice.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
Post by First Post
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have
asked you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout
promises >> > > to do that duty to the best of his ability. A queer
would never >> > > have passed our Board. I resigned because of age
not because >> > > anyone disagreed with me. Membership in a Church
is not a >> > > requirement. But anyone who thinks two rocks
colliding produced >> > > the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken >> > > away by the guards.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
Post by First Post
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Hugh
I remember in the 1960s in elementary school, by the time I was
in >> > 3rd grade virtually every 8 year old male in the school had
joined >> > the Cub Scouts. By the time I started Junior High
roughly a >> > quarter of them were still scouts advancing up to the
Boy Scouts. >> > I was a Cub Scout and then later on, in my Junior
year in high >> > school, I joined the Explorers. In Memphis it was
a Police post. >> > And I was in it until I graduated.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
Post by First Post
Today I work in a lot of both public and private schools
servicing >> > mass notification systems and emergency communication
systems. >> > I don't remember the last time I saw even a single Cub
Scout in any >> > of them in at least 3 decades now. Of course, for
the last five or >> > six years the school uniform policies prevent
the kids from wearing >> > their uniforms to school as we used to on
the days of the meetings, >> > But I doubt you'd see any regardless
these days. >> >
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
Post by First Post
Back then when Scouting was seen as something that every boy
should >> > at least try, we never had any of the kind of violence
and crime >> > that you now see rampant in the very same schools
today. >>
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Jon Brooks
In the old days, the last thing you wanted to tangle with in
school, was a bunch of boy scouts in uniform because they were a
confident lot who would beat some ass to a pulp and take their
lumps for it. They stuck up for each other and usually had
positive role model big brothers too. We can thank the sneering
left wing for the currently sad state of a once proud
organization.
Your experience wasn't universal. I'm now in my 60s too, and the Boy
Scouts back then were considered mostly sissies. Literally none of
them were athletes, either. (At least, none that I can recall.)
Don't know where you went to school but at my old alma mater in
Memphis, Trezevant HS, literally every boy who played on our champion
football team were former Cub and Boy Scouts.
Although I never cared for athletic participation back then because it
took time away from my hanging out with friends and chasing skirts, I
was never ever considered to be any kind of "sissy".
I was in the ROTC drill team as well as our state champion rifle team
as I could, and still can, shoot the ass out of a gnat at 50 feet.
Yes, that is simply an expression but the targets we used were the
size of a half dollar and they indeed were pinned at the 50 foot line
and I consistently shot bullseyes.
But back to the scouts, some of the toughest and meanest kids I knew
also were in the scouts at least for a while.
And yes there were some that could be considered "sissies" in the
classic sense but they were still honest, hard working and all around
good kids.
Surely then my experience must have been atypical. Scouts where I came
from were ALL viewed as nerds or worse. Thanks for straightening me out
on that, FP.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 13:51:56 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:46:57 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Surely then my experience must have been atypical. Scouts where I came
from were ALL viewed as nerds or worse. Thanks for straightening me out
on that, FP.
We are all the products of our experiences - good or bad.

My association was with achievers - CEOs, business owners,
professionals, et al. One good friend has a PhD in Theology and
another is a member of MENSA. Thus I am oriented to succeed in what
responsible people would consider worthwhile endeavors.

I have worked with underprivileged people in sports, education and
business. I have hired them. I believe that is an obligation of those
who have a lot of advantages.

Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 10:12:56 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:02:42 -0500, First Post
Post by First Post
No one can deny that Scouting had a positive influence on the kids.
But now, thanks to the so called bleeding hearts who made it their
mission to destroy the Scouts for what they stood for, our schools
feel more like prisons with full time police officers being necessary
in order to keep the students at least somewhat peaceful.
You see kids talking to their own mothers as if they were gutter trash
and even physically abusing them in some instances.
Of course I agree with you.

But being nice doesn't compete with the worthless trash attempting to
overthrow everything that made this a once great country.

"Progressive" or "liberal" means increasing riots and mass murders to
accomplish one's goals.

If one investigates I suspect he would find that those who disagree
with me could not exist without government subsidy crutches to help
them limp through life. They certainlt don't indicate sufficient
intelligence to escape that black hole.

Jeanne seems to think flopping her boobs on this newsgroup is
indicative of some intelligence beyond a capacity for breeding.

Hugh
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:18:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:02:42 -0500, First Post
Post by First Post
No one can deny that Scouting had a positive influence on the kids.
But now, thanks to the so called bleeding hearts who made it their
mission to destroy the Scouts for what they stood for, our schools
feel more like prisons with full time police officers being necessary
in order to keep the students at least somewhat peaceful.
You see kids talking to their own mothers as if they were gutter trash
and even physically abusing them in some instances.
Of course I agree with you.
But being nice doesn't compete with the worthless trash attempting to
overthrow everything that made this a once great country.
"Progressive" or "liberal" means increasing riots and mass murders to
accomplish one's goals.
Support that ridiculous statement.
Post by Mr. B1ack
If one investigates I suspect he would find that those who disagree
with me could not exist without government subsidy crutches to help
them limp through life. They certainlt don't indicate sufficient
intelligence to escape that black hole.
Jeanne seems to think flopping her boobs on this newsgroup is
indicative of some intelligence beyond a capacity for breeding.
And here's another lame attempt at nastiness. With misogyny.

<yawn>
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 15:08:57 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:18:57 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:02:42 -0500, First Post
Post by First Post
No one can deny that Scouting had a positive influence on the kids.
But now, thanks to the so called bleeding hearts who made it their
mission to destroy the Scouts for what they stood for, our schools
feel more like prisons with full time police officers being necessary
in order to keep the students at least somewhat peaceful.
You see kids talking to their own mothers as if they were gutter trash
and even physically abusing them in some instances.
Of course I agree with you.
But being nice doesn't compete with the worthless trash attempting to
overthrow everything that made this a once great country.
"Progressive" or "liberal" means increasing riots and mass murders to
accomplish one's goals.
Support that ridiculous statement.
obama was elected in 2008. The problems I mentioned have increased
dramatically since then. He is a progressive or liberal. You may have
a different opinion but my statement cannot be refuted.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Mr. B1ack
If one investigates I suspect he would find that those who disagree
with me could not exist without government subsidy crutches to help
them limp through life. They certainlt don't indicate sufficient
intelligence to escape that black hole.
Jeanne seems to think flopping her boobs on this newsgroup is
indicative of some intelligence beyond a capacity for breeding.
And here's another lame attempt at nastiness. With misogyny.
<yawn>
--
JD
Asleep you might be acceptable.

Keep cross-posting, girlie.

Hugh
Mr. B1ack
2016-03-18 01:52:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were NOT in
favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let *me* join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God.
And I would have said there was no such thing ... just
another old superstitious belief.

But, as I said, it's pretty much a private org and if they
require members to have three eyes then, well, they
need to have three eyes and the ACLU can just find
something more important to worry about. I've never
seen anything "wrong" with the BSA and it's primary
aims and ideology, while not really my cup of tea,
isn't evil and certainly won't turn out terrible people.
You can do a LOT worse - lots and lots worse - than
to be a Scout.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who doesn't needs to go back to school. But
I'm not gonna force you :-)
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Ah ... but it was modeled after the BSA and included similar
activities, including hiking, physical sports - and according to
a Wikipedia article even offered an "Aviation badge" in 1916.

None of this is what a "proper young lady" of the previous
generation was supposed to be doing - she was supposed
to sit quitely around in nice clothes doing needlepoint, talking
about nothing important and basically just wait for the aunties
to find her a husband so she could have 15 kids ... basically
a breeding-unit without any other ambitions.

So what the Girl Guides/GSA offered was RADICAL stuff,
once you consider the cultural context. It aimed to turn
sweet young nothings into active, informed, omnicapable
citizens. In short GSA put some "guy stuff" into girls
lives ... why, they might even want the vote someday !
Probably run by Reds !!! :-)
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 09:10:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates.
I earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter
to National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had
little choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God.
And I would have said there was no such thing ... just
another old superstitious belief.
But, as I said, it's pretty much a private org and if they
require members to have three eyes then, well, they
need to have three eyes and the ACLU can just find
something more important to worry about. I've never
seen anything "wrong" with the BSA and it's primary
aims and ideology, while not really my cup of tea,
isn't evil and certainly won't turn out terrible people.
You can do a LOT worse - lots and lots worse - than
to be a Scout.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with
me. Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who
thinks two rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every
day needs to have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who doesn't needs to go back to school. But
I'm not gonna force you :-)
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
Ah ... but it was modeled after the BSA and included similar
activities, including hiking, physical sports - and according to
a Wikipedia article even offered an "Aviation badge" in 1916.
None of this is what a "proper young lady" of the previous
generation was supposed to be doing - she was supposed
to sit quitely around in nice clothes doing needlepoint, talking
about nothing important and basically just wait for the aunties
to find her a husband so she could have 15 kids ... basically
a breeding-unit without any other ambitions.
So what the Girl Guides/GSA offered was RADICAL stuff,
once you consider the cultural context. It aimed to turn
sweet young nothings into active, informed, omnicapable
citizens. In short GSA put some "guy stuff" into girls
lives ... why, they might even want the vote someday !
Probably run by Reds !!! :-)
Good points. And thanks for the info.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 10:43:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
And I would have said there was no such thing ... just
another old superstitious belief.
I have no objection to that. But you are not good enough to earn
Eagle.
Post by Mr. B1ack
But, as I said, it's pretty much a private org and if they
require members to have three eyes then, well, they
need to have three eyes and the ACLU can just find
something more important to worry about. I've never
seen anything "wrong" with the BSA and it's primary
aims and ideology, while not really my cup of tea,
isn't evil and certainly won't turn out terrible people.
You can do a LOT worse - lots and lots worse - than
to be a Scout.
Yes, there are many non-Scouts running around to ptrove your
statement.
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who doesn't needs to go back to school. But
I'm not gonna force you :-)
I hired people who earned their Masters 30 years after I graduated
with a BS in math. They learned from me. I find the teachers I see
today VERY weak except in private schools.
Post by Mr. B1ack
Ah ... but it was modeled after the BSA and included similar
activities, including hiking, physical sports - and according to
a Wikipedia article even offered an "Aviation badge" in 1916.
About 4 years ago I was asked to give the "charge" for both Eagle and
Gold awards. I assure the girl was an athlete and an outstanding
scholar who went to a Catholic high school.
Post by Mr. B1ack
None of this is what a "proper young lady" of the previous
generation was supposed to be doing - she was supposed
to sit quitely around in nice clothes doing needlepoint, talking
about nothing important and basically just wait for the aunties
to find her a husband so she could have 15 kids ... basically
a breeding-unit without any other ambitions.
I am a firm believer that, behind every successful man there is a
good, strong woman. I enjoy both.
Post by Mr. B1ack
So what the Girl Guides/GSA offered was RADICAL stuff,
once you consider the cultural context. It aimed to turn
sweet young nothings into active, informed, omnicapable
citizens. In short GSA put some "guy stuff" into girls
lives ... why, they might even want the vote someday !
Probably run by Reds !!! :-)
I grew up in an era where men were the breadwinners and women ran the
house. That did not make us unequal if one uses 67 3/4 years of
marriage as a rule.

Unfortunately men are apparently incapable of holding up their end of
the bargain now so their wives and unmarried sluts have to work.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 12:48:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
And I would have said there was no such thing ... just
another old superstitious belief.
I have no objection to that. But you are not good enough to earn
Eagle.
He's probably much better.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
But, as I said, it's pretty much a private org and if they
require members to have three eyes then, well, they
need to have three eyes and the ACLU can just find
something more important to worry about. I've never
seen anything "wrong" with the BSA and it's primary
aims and ideology, while not really my cup of tea,
isn't evil and certainly won't turn out terrible people.
You can do a LOT worse - lots and lots worse - than
to be a Scout.
Yes, there are many non-Scouts running around to ptrove your
statement.
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed
our Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed
with me. Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone
who thinks two rocks colliding produced the consistency we see
every day needs to have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who doesn't needs to go back to school. But
I'm not gonna force you :-)
I hired people who earned their Masters 30 years after I graduated
with a BS in math. They learned from me. I find the teachers I see
Cool. I too have a BS in math.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
today VERY weak except in private schools.
I had two of my kids in private schools for only one year and removed
them because, among other reasons, their teachers were so stupid. But
for the most part, all of my kids were homeschooled. And they're all
very successful, notwithstanding the fantasies I read here of
homeschooled kids turning out extremely stupid.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Ah ... but it was modeled after the BSA and included similar
activities, including hiking, physical sports - and according to
a Wikipedia article even offered an "Aviation badge" in 1916.
About 4 years ago I was asked to give the "charge" for both Eagle and
Gold awards. I assure the girl was an athlete and an outstanding
scholar who went to a Catholic high school.
Post by Mr. B1ack
None of this is what a "proper young lady" of the previous
generation was supposed to be doing - she was supposed
to sit quitely around in nice clothes doing needlepoint, talking
about nothing important and basically just wait for the aunties
to find her a husband so she could have 15 kids ... basically
a breeding-unit without any other ambitions.
I am a firm believer that, behind every successful man there is a
good, strong woman. I enjoy both.
Post by Mr. B1ack
So what the Girl Guides/GSA offered was RADICAL stuff,
once you consider the cultural context. It aimed to turn
sweet young nothings into active, informed, omnicapable
citizens. In short GSA put some "guy stuff" into girls
lives ... why, they might even want the vote someday !
Probably run by Reds !!! :-)
I grew up in an era where men were the breadwinners and women ran the
house. That did not make us unequal if one uses 67 3/4 years of
marriage as a rule.
Exactly. Women were never unequal, at least not in the US.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Unfortunately men are apparently incapable of holding up their end of
Is that really the reason most women have to work?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
the bargain now so their wives and unmarried sluts have to work.
What's an "unmarried slut"?
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:40:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
And I would have said there was no such thing ... just
another old superstitious belief.
I have no objection to that. But you are not good enough to earn
Eagle.
He's probably much better.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
But, as I said, it's pretty much a private org and if they
require members to have three eyes then, well, they
need to have three eyes and the ACLU can just find
something more important to worry about. I've never
seen anything "wrong" with the BSA and it's primary
aims and ideology, while not really my cup of tea,
isn't evil and certainly won't turn out terrible people.
You can do a LOT worse - lots and lots worse - than
to be a Scout.
Yes, there are many non-Scouts running around to ptrove your
statement.
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed
our Board. I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed
with me. Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone
who thinks two rocks colliding produced the consistency we see
every day needs to have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who doesn't needs to go back to school. But
I'm not gonna force you :-)
I hired people who earned their Masters 30 years after I graduated
with a BS in math. They learned from me. I find the teachers I see
Cool. I too have a BS in math.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
today VERY weak except in private schools.
I had two of my kids in private schools for only one year and removed
them because, among other reasons, their teachers were so stupid. But
for the most part, all of my kids were homeschooled. And they're all
very successful, notwithstanding the fantasies I read here of
homeschooled kids turning out extremely stupid.
No, it's only the fundie nuts that homeschool their kids with the bible
and dishonest "textbooks" from fundie organizations. There are parents
in Texas (of course it's Texas) who are fighting in court for the right
to teach their children nothing because they won't need knowledge when
they're raptured away, any day now.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
the bargain now so their wives and unmarried sluts have to work.
What's an "unmarried slut"?
And how do they differ from "married sluts"?
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 15:19:09 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:40:00 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
And how do they differ from "married sluts"?
...no marriage certificate.

Hugh
Beam Me Up Scotty
2016-03-18 15:21:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:40:00 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
And how do they differ from "married sluts"?
they pay more taxes....
--
That's Karma
k***@maricaibo.com
2016-03-18 16:58:27 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:21:14 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
Post by Beam Me Up Scotty
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:40:00 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
And how do they differ from "married sluts"?
they pay more taxes....
Or---stupid enough like you to pay the wealthy's taxes
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 11:47:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
And I would have said there was no such thing ... just
another old superstitious belief.
I have no objection to that. But you are not good enough to earn
Eagle.
He's probably much better.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
But, as I said, it's pretty much a private org and if they
require members to have three eyes then, well, they
need to have three eyes and the ACLU can just find
something more important to worry about. I've never
seen anything "wrong" with the BSA and it's primary
aims and ideology, while not really my cup of tea,
isn't evil and certainly won't turn out terrible people.
You can do a LOT worse - lots and lots worse - than
to be a Scout.
Yes, there are many non-Scouts running around to ptrove your
statement.
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have
passed our Board. I resigned because of age not because
anyone disagreed with me. Membership in a Church is not a
requirement. But anyone who thinks two rocks colliding
produced the consistency we see every day needs to have his
crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who doesn't needs to go back to school. But
I'm not gonna force you :-)
I hired people who earned their Masters 30 years after I graduated
with a BS in math. They learned from me. I find the teachers I see
Cool. I too have a BS in math.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
today VERY weak except in private schools.
I had two of my kids in private schools for only one year and
removed them because, among other reasons, their teachers were so
stupid. But for the most part, all of my kids were homeschooled.
And they're all very successful, notwithstanding the fantasies I
read here of homeschooled kids turning out extremely stupid.
No, it's only the fundie nuts that homeschool their kids with the
bible and dishonest "textbooks" from fundie organizations. There are
parents in Texas (of course it's Texas) who are fighting in court for
the right to teach their children nothing because they won't need
knowledge when they're raptured away, any day now.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
the bargain now so their wives and unmarried sluts have to work.
What's an "unmarried slut"?
And how do they differ from "married sluts"?
Good question. How can there be any difference.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 15:17:35 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:48:56 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
And I would have said there was no such thing ... just
another old superstitious belief.
I have no objection to that. But you are not good enough to earn
Eagle.
He's probably much better.
Most people are in some area. I hired several.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I hired people who earned their Masters 30 years after I graduated
with a BS in math. They learned from me. I find the teachers I see
Cool. I too have a BS in math.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
today VERY weak except in private schools.
I had two of my kids in private schools for only one year and removed
them because, among other reasons, their teachers were so stupid. But
for the most part, all of my kids were homeschooled. And they're all
very successful, notwithstanding the fantasies I read here of
homeschooled kids turning out extremely stupid.
My grandkids who went/go to a private school graded better than 30 on
the ACT.

Of the 400+ Eagle candidates I reviewed the homeschooled were some of
the more intelligent and comfortable at the review - and that includes
comparison with one on break from his freshman year at MIT.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Exactly. Women were never unequal, at least not in the US.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Unfortunately men are apparently incapable of holding up their end of
Is that really the reason most women have to work?
It seems a logical conclusion.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
the bargain now so their wives and unmarried sluts have to work.
What's an "unmarried slut"?
I didn't realize how redundant that was when I posted.

Hugh
Alex W.
2016-03-18 23:42:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I am a firm believer that, behind every successful man there is a
good, strong woman. I enjoy both.
"Behind"?

Rephrase that as "beside", and you'd have a point I'd agree with.

Men who prefer their women stupid, subservient and uneducated are as
dumb as they come.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
So what the Girl Guides/GSA offered was RADICAL stuff,
once you consider the cultural context. It aimed to turn
sweet young nothings into active, informed, omnicapable
citizens. In short GSA put some "guy stuff" into girls
lives ... why, they might even want the vote someday !
Probably run by Reds !!! :-)
I grew up in an era where men were the breadwinners and women ran the
house. That did not make us unequal if one uses 67 3/4 years of
marriage as a rule.
Unfortunately men are apparently incapable of holding up their end of
the bargain now so their wives and unmarried sluts have to work.
What you fail to take into account is that this very period is not the
norm. It is the outlier. For 99.99% of human civilisation, both man
and woman had to work to make ends meet. What we are experiencing is
the end of a very abnormal period in human history.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 11:41:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I am a firm believer that, behind every successful man there is a
good, strong woman. I enjoy both.
"Behind"?
Rephrase that as "beside", and you'd have a point I'd agree with.
"Behind" as in supportive and pushing for excellence. We walk side by
side with me on the outside.
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Unfortunately men are apparently incapable of holding up their end of
the bargain now so their wives and unmarried sluts have to work.
What you fail to take into account is that this very period is not the
norm. It is the outlier. For 99.99% of human civilisation, both man
and woman had to work to make ends meet. What we are experiencing is
the end of a very abnormal period in human history.
It's not the norm, it's evolution. The world is dumbing down. At the
end you mention it will only get worse.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 08:52:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board.
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the other
reasons they wouldn't have passed?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their "moral"
values.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
The Girl Scouts were a little more leftish from the
get-go however.
That get-go is probably a little more recent than you think.
Originally they were as moral as the BSA used to be.
And we just read how you define "moral".
Alex W.
2016-03-18 10:12:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
Maybe he was being accurate?

I once charred a chair. OK, I was bored and I had a lighter and I got a
good walloping for it, but it did char...
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 11:59:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils
were NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
Maybe he was being accurate?
I once charred a chair. OK, I was bored and I had a lighter and I
got a good walloping for it, but it did char...
LOL!! I thought of that too but refrained from referencing it because
he'd only used one "r" in his typo.

But I apologized to him for that. Only assholes flame typos and,
although I admit I'm regularly an asshole, I'm not usually the sort of
asshole who flames typos.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 15:23:07 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:59:46 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Alex W.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils
were NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
Maybe he was being accurate?
I once charred a chair. OK, I was bored and I had a lighter and I
got a good walloping for it, but it did char...
LOL!! I thought of that too but refrained from referencing it because
he'd only used one "r" in his typo.
But I apologized to him for that. Only assholes flame typos and,
although I admit I'm regularly an asshole, I'm not usually the sort of
asshole who flames typos.
I expect to be criticized for a typo so no apology expected. I still
have not used all of my first eraser.

Anyone who majors in math has a lot of self-confidence.

Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 11:12:51 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:52:55 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
I am not a typist. On newsgroups like this I don't bother to edit what
I post. Mea culpa if that makes you feel better.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board.
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the other
reasons they wouldn't have passed?
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
sleep with man. Thus a homo is deliberately violating God's command if
he does. If he doesn't commit the act he is not a homo. IOW does he
commit the sin. If I quit smoking (cold turkey) after 30 years and 3
packs a day a homo can quit queering - unless you agree that it is a
genetic defect. And they wouldn't parade that around.

Whether there is a God and whether being a homo is a sin is not open
for discussion. I won't try to convert you and you can't convert me.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their "moral"
values.
There is NO WAY I would suggest that. I think every intelligent person
must ultimately conclude that we are not an accident. There was a
Creator. Science never ends because there are always new discoveries -
this week a new fossil and proof that we bred with Neanderthals and
Denisovans.

Based on science I doubt that Adam was created 6,000 years ago. I
don't know the length of a Biblical year. I don't have a problem with
evolution. God might have created the first man from a monkey. I am
not disturbed if PhDs in Theology disagree with me. I think science
will ultimately prove there was a Creator Christians call God.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
And we just read how you define "moral".
I don't define it - God did that. I just abide by it as best I can. In
today's culture I subscribe more to the intolerance of the Old
Testament than the tolerance of the New.

Please don't hesitate to point out my typos in the future if
cross-posting continues. It moves my regard needle off zero for you.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-18 11:55:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:52:55 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
I am not a typist. On newsgroups like this I don't bother to edit what
I post. Mea culpa if that makes you feel better.
Sorry. Only assholes flame typos, as I never hesitate to remind others
here, and as I'd reminded myself even while writing that.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do
that >> duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have
passed our >> Board.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the
other reasons they wouldn't have passed?
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
sleep with man. Thus a homo is deliberately violating God's command if
he does. If he doesn't commit the act he is not a homo. IOW does he
Maybe and maybe not, even if you really need to believe the Bible. Re:
"The Gay Gospels" by Keith Sharpe. He makes a pretty good case,
including his explanation of the Leviticus passage.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
commit the sin. If I quit smoking (cold turkey) after 30 years and 3
packs a day a homo can quit queering - unless you agree that it is a
genetic defect. And they wouldn't parade that around.
Homosexuality been discussed on talk.origins and is likely even in
their archive. If you're at all interested in the truth (I mean the
true truth, not your religious lies) you'll read about it.
Homosexuality is probably natural.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Whether there is a God and whether being a homo is a sin is not open
for discussion. I won't try to convert you and you can't convert me.
Np. I'm not an atheist either.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their
"moral" values.
There is NO WAY I would suggest that. I think every intelligent person
must ultimately conclude that we are not an accident.
Indeed. The FSM created the universe, earth, and life in 4 days and
rested for 3. We know that because it tells us so in our Scripture.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
There was a Creator.
It's well known that Einstein occassionally referred to God. Ever read
his explanation of what he meant by that?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Science never ends because there are always new discoveries -
this week a new fossil and proof that we bred with Neanderthals and
Denisovans.
Based on science I doubt that Adam was created 6,000 years ago. I
don't know the length of a Biblical year. I don't have a problem with
evolution. God might have created the first man from a monkey. I am
not disturbed if PhDs in Theology disagree with me. I think science
will ultimately prove there was a Creator Christians call God.
Interesting idea.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Ted&Alice Street
And we just read how you define "moral".
I don't define it - God did that. I just abide by it as best I can. In
today's culture I subscribe more to the intolerance of the Old
Testament than the tolerance of the New.
Please don't hesitate to point out my typos in the future if
Again, I apologize for that. Only assholes flame typos and I was being
an asshole.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
cross-posting continues. It moves my regard needle off zero for you.
Really, though, there's no law against cross-posting.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 15:56:28 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:55:26 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I am not a typist. On newsgroups like this I don't bother to edit what
I post. Mea culpa if that makes you feel better.
Sorry. Only assholes flame typos, as I never hesitate to remind others
here, and as I'd reminded myself even while writing that.
Errors should be corrected. Only those who don't know better resent.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
sleep with man. Thus a homo is deliberately violating God's command if
he does. If he doesn't commit the act he is not a homo. IOW does he
"The Gay Gospels" by Keith Sharpe. He makes a pretty good case,
including his explanation of the Leviticus passage.
I am aware that some have spent years trying to spin what was said.
But if being queer was not bad they wouldn't want people to lie and
call them gay.

I really never needed the Bible to tell me that penetrating the
defecation orifice of a man was as nasty as it gets - except for using
the mouth as a sexual organ.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Homosexuality been discussed on talk.origins and is likely even in
their archive. If you're at all interested in the truth (I mean the
true truth, not your religious lies) you'll read about it.
Homosexuality is probably natural.
I believe, based on reading experts, that there is a slight genetic
difference in them. I find it almost impossible to believe it is a
choice.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
There is NO WAY I would suggest that. I think every intelligent person
must ultimately conclude that we are not an accident.
Indeed. The FSM created the universe, earth, and life in 4 days and
rested for 3. We know that because it tells us so in our Scripture.
I'm not hung up on taking the Bible literally. I don't know what a
Biblical day was. I believe in a Creator and the Bible is a great
guide for humans. If there is a Heaven I want to wind up there.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Based on science I doubt that Adam was created 6,000 years ago. I
don't know the length of a Biblical year. I don't have a problem with
evolution. God might have created the first man from a monkey. I am
not disturbed if PhDs in Theology disagree with me. I think science
will ultimately prove there was a Creator Christians call God.
Interesting idea.
It's part of the reason why I have the world's best attitude. I don't
sweat the small stuff and I don't pet the sweaty stuff.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Really, though, there's no law against cross-posting.
Agreed. But I hope I don't place a permanent footprint on Jeanne's
rear end. In more responsible and moral circles I'm considered too
nice for that.

I really enjoy the confrontation. I'll miss it when scouting is not
included in the cross.

Hugh
Alex W.
2016-03-18 23:46:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:55:26 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I am not a typist. On newsgroups like this I don't bother to edit what
I post. Mea culpa if that makes you feel better.
Sorry. Only assholes flame typos, as I never hesitate to remind others
here, and as I'd reminded myself even while writing that.
Errors should be corrected. Only those who don't know better resent.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
sleep with man. Thus a homo is deliberately violating God's command if
he does. If he doesn't commit the act he is not a homo. IOW does he
"The Gay Gospels" by Keith Sharpe. He makes a pretty good case,
including his explanation of the Leviticus passage.
I am aware that some have spent years trying to spin what was said.
But if being queer was not bad they wouldn't want people to lie and
call them gay.
I really never needed the Bible to tell me that penetrating the
defecation orifice of a man was as nasty as it gets - except for using
the mouth as a sexual organ.
The woman's vagina is a "defecation orifice".

You were saying?

Plus, of course, the confounded problem that if it were so unnatural,
why are humans possessed of nerves in that organ to register pleasure
rather than pain...
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 11:47:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:55:26 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I am not a typist. On newsgroups like this I don't bother to edit what
I post. Mea culpa if that makes you feel better.
Sorry. Only assholes flame typos, as I never hesitate to remind others
here, and as I'd reminded myself even while writing that.
Errors should be corrected. Only those who don't know better resent.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
sleep with man. Thus a homo is deliberately violating God's command if
he does. If he doesn't commit the act he is not a homo. IOW does he
"The Gay Gospels" by Keith Sharpe. He makes a pretty good case,
including his explanation of the Leviticus passage.
I am aware that some have spent years trying to spin what was said.
But if being queer was not bad they wouldn't want people to lie and
call them gay.
I really never needed the Bible to tell me that penetrating the
defecation orifice of a man was as nasty as it gets - except for using
the mouth as a sexual organ.
The woman's vagina is a "defecation orifice".
Defecation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defecation
Wikipedia
Defecation is the final act of digestion, by which organisms eliminate
solid, semisolid, and/or liquid waste material from the digestive
tract via the anus.
Post by Alex W.
You were saying?
You were ignoranting?
Post by Alex W.
Plus, of course, the confounded problem that if it were so unnatural,
why are humans possessed of nerves in that organ to register pleasure
rather than pain...
It pains me to know a person can be a homo. So the reverse logic would
be that I should pleasure myself by hurting him. SInce my yourh that
has become unnatural.

Your logic is unbelivably weak.

Hugh
Lord Baden Powell MCMVIII
2016-03-19 11:57:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Your logic is unbelivably weak.
Hugh
Jesus? The Southern Jesus who was King of the Christians, not the Jews that
the slave ownersd of America talked about always hated homsexuals and lazy
niggers who refused to work hard for the White Man under the whip!


The Gospels tell us that all Jesus talked about was Queers, Abortion and the
right to bear arms to shoot your fellow Americans!

The only thing that Megyn Kelly was right about was when she told us all that
Jesus Christ was White. Not some Middle Eastern cocksucker with brown skin.

At least Megyn and Trump agree on one known truth.


The truth that we should teach all the niggers and all the white boys.

Donald Trump has White Queers from the Deep South Polisihing his ass every
night before he goes on stage to tell us how he's gonna make us Great!
Pete
2016-03-19 17:14:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lord Baden Powell MCMVIII
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Your logic is unbelivably weak.
Hugh
Jesus? The Southern Jesus who was King of the Christians, not the Jews that
the slave ownersd
Many of the slaves in the South were owned by blacks. Most
black slave owners owned at least 10 black slaves or it wasn't
profitable for them.

When will you liberal pukes acknowledge that in those
politically correct history books you sell to children?

You do know some of those children learn to read and find out
the truth anyway.
k***@maricaibo.com
2016-03-19 19:56:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pete
Many of the slaves in the South were owned by blacks. Most
black slave owners owned at least 10 black slaves or it wasn't
profitable for them.
Laws in the south did not allow blacks to own anything---let alone be
considered human enough to avail themselves of land and property.
Post by Pete
When will you liberal pukes acknowledge that in those
politically correct history books you sell to children?
Perhaps you're thinking of the millions of textbooks printed in the
south that denied the slavery problem like Hitler denies the Holocaust
Post by Pete
You do know some of those children learn to read and find out
the truth anyway.
Trying to rid themselves of the Nazi and white supremacist tatoos are
the hardest.
Jeanne Douglas
2016-03-18 13:09:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:52:55 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
I am not a typist. On newsgroups like this I don't bother to edit what
I post. Mea culpa if that makes you feel better.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board.
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the other
reasons they wouldn't have passed?
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
sleep with man. Thus a homo is deliberately violating God's command if
he does. If he doesn't commit the act he is not a homo. IOW does he
commit the sin. If I quit smoking (cold turkey) after 30 years and 3
packs a day a homo can quit queering - unless you agree that it is a
genetic defect. And they wouldn't parade that around.
Whether there is a God and whether being a homo is a sin is not open
for discussion. I won't try to convert you and you can't convert me.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their "moral"
values.
There is NO WAY I would suggest that. I think every intelligent person
must ultimately conclude that we are not an accident.
Why? Based on what?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
There was a
Creator. Science never ends because there are always new discoveries -
this week a new fossil and proof that we bred with Neanderthals and
Denisovans.
Based on science I doubt that Adam was created 6,000 years ago. I
don't know the length of a Biblical year. I don't have a problem with
evolution. God might have created the first man from a monkey.I am
not disturbed if PhDs in Theology disagree with me. I think science
will ultimately prove there was a Creator Christians call God.
Based on what?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Ted&Alice Street
And we just read how you define "moral".
I don't define it - God did that. I just abide by it as best I can. In
today's culture I subscribe more to the intolerance of the Old
Testament than the tolerance of the New.
So you don't eat bacon or spare ribs? Or shellfish? You don't wear
clothes of mixed fabric (forget that spandex, forget that cotton/poly
blend)? There are over 600 "laws from God" in the Bible and I know
you've probably broken many of them.

So why is the "law" about gays the only abomination we hear about, Mr.
OT?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Please don't hesitate to point out my typos in the future if
cross-posting continues. It moves my regard needle off zero for you.
--
JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 16:03:48 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:09:07 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
There is NO WAY I would suggest that. I think every intelligent person
must ultimately conclude that we are not an accident.
Why? Based on what?
Because I have considered all the alternatives and made my decision.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Based on science I doubt that Adam was created 6,000 years ago. I
don't know the length of a Biblical year. I don't have a problem with
evolution. God might have created the first man from a monkey.I am
not disturbed if PhDs in Theology disagree with me. I think science
will ultimately prove there was a Creator Christians call God.
Based on what?
It's at least as logical as any other conclusion.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So you don't eat bacon or spare ribs? Or shellfish? You don't wear
clothes of mixed fabric (forget that spandex, forget that cotton/poly
blend)? There are over 600 "laws from God" in the Bible and I know
you've probably broken many of them.
I'm not Jewish. I can't explain it very well but Christ came to
fulfill certain of the laws of the OT. But he did not change the
morals.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So why is the "law" about gays the only abomination we hear about, Mr.
OT?
I'm not aware of a law about "gays".

If I called a dog's tail a leg would you say the dog had 5 legs?

Hugh
Bob Officer
2016-03-18 17:56:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:52:55 +0000 (UTC), "Ted&Alice Street"
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
I am not a typist. On newsgroups like this I don't bother to edit what
I post. Mea culpa if that makes you feel better.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board.
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the other
reasons they wouldn't have passed?
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
There in one line is your problem.

You allowed someone imagination to run steal you ability to think, then
stacked you bias on top it the mindless programming you had done to you.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
sleep with man. Thus a homo is deliberately violating God's command if
he does. If he doesn't commit the act he is not a homo. IOW does he
commit the sin. If I quit smoking (cold turkey) after 30 years and 3
packs a day a homo can quit queering - unless you agree that it is a
genetic defect. And they wouldn't parade that around.
Whether there is a God and whether being a homo is a sin is not open
for discussion. I won't try to convert you and you can't convert me.
So you won't come out of the closet.
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their "moral"
values.
There is NO WAY I would suggest that. I think every intelligent person
must ultimately conclude that we are not an accident. There was a
Creator. Science never ends because there are always new discoveries -
this week a new fossil and proof that we bred with Neanderthals and
Denisovans.
Based on science I doubt that Adam was created 6,000 years ago. I
don't know the length of a Biblical year. I don't have a problem with
evolution. God might have created the first man from a monkey. I am
not disturbed if PhDs in Theology disagree with me. I think science
will ultimately prove there was a Creator Christians call God.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
And we just read how you define "moral".
I don't define it - God did that. I just abide by it as best I can. In
today's culture I subscribe more to the intolerance of the Old
Testament than the tolerance of the New.
Please don't hesitate to point out my typos in the future if
cross-posting continues. It moves my regard needle off zero for you.
Hugh
--
Yep it is me, and Carole believes adding 2+2 can sometimes equal 3 or 5,
and getting wrong answers means you are thinking outside the box.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-18 18:37:50 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:56:28 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
A duty to God is to obey his word. He left no doubt that man is not to
There in one line is your problem.
You allowed someone imagination to run steal you ability to think, then
stacked you bias on top it the mindless programming you had done to you.
It's okay to say that now, R2D2. I no longer am responsible for cash
managing up to $300,000,000 per month during the winter and about 2/3
of that during the summer.
Post by Bob Officer
So you won't come out of the closet.
Actually it's a man cave wih all the trophies and certificates of
accomplishment covering the walls.

Hugh
Mr. B1ack
2016-03-19 02:18:49 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:56:28 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
Yep it is me, and Carole believes adding 2+2 can sometimes equal 3 or 5,
and getting wrong answers means you are thinking outside the box.
Well ... that can work with measurements in non-Euclidian spaces.

Hmm, are there ANY actual Euclidian spaces ? :-)

Anyway, I'll encourage you to not be mean to the theists.
Everybody has to "believe" is a LOT of stuff because the
full and exact facts aren't always availible (or maybe the
issue is so subjective there'll never be sure answers).
SO, we have to "best guess" it, and religions are one kind
of "best guessing" that's always been very popular.

Not a super-GOOD kind of guessing, but it does have
broad appeal and we'll have to cope with it.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 11:51:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:56:28 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
Yep it is me, and Carole believes adding 2+2 can sometimes equal 3 or 5,
and getting wrong answers means you are thinking outside the box.
Well ... that can work with measurements in non-Euclidian spaces.
Hmm, are there ANY actual Euclidian spaces ? :-)
Anyway, I'll encourage you to not be mean to the theists.
Everybody has to "believe" is a LOT of stuff because the
full and exact facts aren't always availible (or maybe the
issue is so subjective there'll never be sure answers).
SO, we have to "best guess" it, and religions are one kind
of "best guessing" that's always been very popular.
Not a super-GOOD kind of guessing, but it does have
broad appeal and we'll have to cope with it.
It's the worst kind of guess except for all the others.

What is your alternative?

Hugh
Beam Me Up Scotty
2016-03-18 15:50:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400 candidates. I
earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business with
the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter to
National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had little
choice.
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do that
duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have passed our
Board.
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the other
reasons they wouldn't have passed?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks two
rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day needs to
have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their "moral"
values.
The problem is when science is corrupted it's NO different than any
other religion. SO treating like any corrupt religion is where it
belongs. We know this because Liberalism has corrupted science.

The combination of corrupt science and delusional Liberalism makes for a
Theocracy. Where anything Liberals want is justified by their delusions
and made acceptable by corrupting science to rationalize it.

Science has become just another religion.
--
That's Karma
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 11:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400
candidates. I >> earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with >> the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter
to >> National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had
little >> choice.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do
that >> duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have
passed our >> Board.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the
other reasons they wouldn't have passed?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks
two >> rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day
needs to >> have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their
"moral" values.
The problem is when science is corrupted it's NO different than any
other religion. SO treating like any corrupt religion is where it
belongs. We know this because Liberalism has corrupted science.
The combination of corrupt science and delusional Liberalism makes
for a Theocracy. Where anything Liberals want is justified by their
delusions and made acceptable by corrupting science to rationalize it.
Science has become just another religion.
Y'know, that's an interesting persective and may even be true in the
case of some social and otherwise imprecise sciences. Otherwise, I'd
have to disagree with it, but it does shed light on a few political
issues.
Alex W.
2016-03-19 12:26:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA Councils were
NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have been
registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all that
time. Well, maybe next year?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400
candidates. I >> earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and the
queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did business
with >> the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a letter
to >> National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated they had
little >> choice.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have asked
you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout promises to do
that >> duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have
passed our >> Board.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the
other reasons they wouldn't have passed?
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with me.
Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone who thinks
two >> rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day
needs to >> have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by teaching our
children to thumb their noses at science needs to rethink their
"moral" values.
The problem is when science is corrupted it's NO different than any
other religion. SO treating like any corrupt religion is where it
belongs. We know this because Liberalism has corrupted science.
The combination of corrupt science and delusional Liberalism makes
for a Theocracy. Where anything Liberals want is justified by their
delusions and made acceptable by corrupting science to rationalize it.
Science has become just another religion.
Y'know, that's an interesting persective and may even be true in the
case of some social and otherwise imprecise sciences. Otherwise, I'd
have to disagree with it, but it does shed light on a few political
issues.
Alas, it is all too easy to corrupt science.

Just add money.

If you then posit a target audience that wouldn't know their dihydrogen
monoxide if they were being waterboarded with the stuff, it becomes
almost too easy.

The real difference betweens science and technology on the one hand and
religion and superstition on the other hand is that one produces
reliable, repeatable and predictable results. The other does not. The
problem with both sides, however, is that the great unwashed approach
both in the same manner: with more or less blind faith. We follow a
rote ritual to effect a hot meal through the miracle of microwaves as
much as we try to effect a love potion by dancing naked widdershins
around a tree stump at full moon while smeared with the blood of a
sacrificed black cockerel. The faith-peddlers promise eternal life and
healing by divine blessing -- and secular snake oil salescritters
bamboozle us in the same way with seemingly authoritative statistics and
figures.

And the solution to these cons? In both cases, the same: education.
J. Hugh Sullivan
2016-03-19 14:09:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alex W.
Alas, it is all too easy to corrupt science.
Just add money.
If you then posit a target audience that wouldn't know their dihydrogen
monoxide if they were being waterboarded with the stuff, it becomes
almost too easy.
The real difference betweens science and technology on the one hand and
religion and superstition on the other hand is that one produces
reliable, repeatable and predictable results. The other does not.
To follow the logic we must all be African-Americans because we
descend from a woman in Africa. Would you please inform obama
supporters.

Fascinating.

Science does not determine the future - it discovers the past. The man
who has no hope must be a very sad individual.

Hugh
Ted&Alice Street
2016-03-19 15:31:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Ted&Alice Street
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:59:47 -0400, Mr. B1ack
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by J. Hugh Sullivan
You generalize a little too much. A number of BSA
Councils were NOT in favor of accepting queers.
MOST of them in fact ... it had to be forced upon
them by legal threats. BSA has always been a very
conservative, indeed kinda theo-right, organization
from its inception. Hell, they wouldn't let me join ...
something about me stating that I wasn't religious :-)
I don't hate 'em though ... their org, they can run it
their way IMHO.
It will be a bit difficult to tell me much about BSA. I have
been registered for 60 years and I Chared the Board of Review
for Eagle
What a pity you never learned how to spell "chair" during all
that time. Well, maybe next year?
Scout candidates for 39 years. I reviewed more than 400
candidates. I >> earned my Eagle in Oct 1943.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
BSA was almost defenseless against the onslaught of ACLU and
the queers. The National Board was composed of CEOs who did
business
with >> the population and there were repercussions. I wrote a
letter >>to >> National expressing my opinion. The reply indicated
they had >>little >> choice.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Had you appeared before me as an Eagle candidate I would have
asked you to tell me about your duty to God. Every Scout
promises to do
that >> duty to the best of his ability. A queer would never have
passed our >> Board.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
A lot of homosexuals believe in God. So what are the some of the
other reasons they wouldn't have passed?
I resigned because of age not because anyone disagreed with
me. Membership in a Church is not a requirement. But anyone
who thinks
two >> rocks colliding produced the consistency we see every day
needs to >> have his crayons taken away by the guards.
Post by Ted&Alice Street
Anyone who wants to plunge the US into the dark ages by
teaching our children to thumb their noses at science needs to
rethink their "moral" values.
The problem is when science is corrupted it's NO different than
any other religion. SO treating like any corrupt religion is
where it belongs. We know this because Liberalism has corrupted
science.
The combination of corrupt science and delusional Liberalism makes
for a Theocracy. Where anything Liberals want is justified by
their delusions and made acceptable by corrupting science to
rationalize it.
Science has become just another religion.
Y'know, that's an interesting persective and may even be true in the
case of some social and otherwise imprecise sciences. Otherwise, I'd
have to disagree with it, but it does shed light on a few political
issues.
Alas, it is all too easy to corrupt science.
Just add money.
If you then posit a target audience that wouldn't know their
dihydrogen monoxide if they were being waterboarded with the stuff,
it becomes almost too easy.
Yup.
The real difference betweens science and technology on the one hand
and religion and superstition on the other hand is that one produces
reliable, repeatable and predictable results. The other does not.
The problem with both sides, however, is that the great unwashed
approach both in the same manner: with more or less blind faith. We
follow a rote ritual to effect a hot meal through the miracle of
microwaves as much as we try to effect a love potion by dancing naked
widdershins around a tree stump at full moon while smeared with the
blood of a sacrificed black cockerel. The faith-peddlers promise
eternal life and healing by divine blessing -- and secular snake oil
salescritters bamboozle us in the same way with seemingly
authoritative statistics and figures.
So well written. Thanks for sharing that, Alex.
And the solution to these cons? In both cases, the same: education.
Probably. But the devil can lurk in the details, depending on who's
designing the "education".
Loading...